The January month of each new year reminds the displaced Kashmiri Pandit community about the circumstances under which it was violently forced into exile.January 20,therefore has a special significance in their community life.This day is observed by Kashmiri Pandits globally as the exodus day and same thing will be repeated this year too which more or less,has become a ritual.This way thirty new year Januaries have come and gone without any noticeable effort on the part of powers that be to recognise the pain and trauma of the beleaguered community though their displacement has received a lot of lip sympathies.
Even though no different from previous years,this January 20 too they find themselves at the same place where they stood thirty years back.Is there any change in them in whatever manner.yes there indeed is a big big change and that is when they left Kashmir,it was a homogenous mass of about 4 lac people but now they are spread globally with tiny pockets of few Kashmiri Pandits scattered here and there.There also has been a shift in the perception of its distinct cultural identity – from ‘Kashmiri Pandits’ to being a part of the larger ‘Hindu identity’ of India.So how to see and perceive this change from being Kashmiri Pandits before exodus and now global Kashmiri Pandits as a part of larger Hindu family of India.The difference cannot be measured from physical spread but by its assertiveness of not giving up on Kashmir from their socio-psychological memory.Had it not been so,there would never have been a near unanimity on the eventual rehabilitation of displaced community in Kashmir a rare commodity though.It is ostensibly motivated by unsuccessful concerns about the progressive decline of their socio-cultural identity in the multicultural world were it finds itself as of now.
It has had a deep influence on their state of mind like that of an unsure Arjuna on the battle field.it captures the most striking aspects of its thought and conduct as regards the socio-political themes of particular importance to the idea of a Kashmiri Pandit in Kashmir.It is not about the past,it is about the future,in the light of the painful lessons of the past.To be precise,Kashmir’s relation with kashmiri Pandits has long been a fraught one,ranging from antagonism to contestation.In the event,the issue has proved irresolvable.On the one hand the immediate political fallout revealed a striking resistance amongst displaced community to any process of rehabilitation and on the other hand there is a strong rejection by combatant and communal forces to the thought of re-connectivity of displaced with the mainland Kashmir.The question remains as to whether the possibility of a large scale intra-community mobilisation on the issue could be conceived.
Nevertheless,due to the long running exile,KP society acquired certain negative and thoroughly indefensible features which unfolded as misconceived and misperceived distrust.Fuel for it was provided by a mass discontent which encouraged sweep of anger and resentment across the length and breadth of the society.It definitely impacted the rhythm and flow of the community and in the coarse of time started being perceived as a community at war with itself.Notable to mention here is that a bunch of few disgruntled young men under the guise of pro-community activists took advantage of this unhappiness in the community but in actuality used it to further their political interests which lie in acting as the proxies of the separatists.To exploit the situation arising out of anger in the community,it provided them a platform to pose as the genuine KP representatives.Quite naturally,It became easy for them thereafter to defame the KP organisations and their managements for a fractured and disunited community.To maximise their visibility,the skilful manipulation of displacement blues brought if not success but not even failure from extracting the maximum from the present predicament.
It has meant a considerable redefinition of the ways in which KP’s have come to see themselves and their place of origin.Among the important questions that this paper seeks to deal with are the different ways in which the intra-community debates have constructed the opposition to their marginalisation and indifference of majoritarian theocracy of Kashmir towards them.Denial of any form of community representation is symbolic of its cascading effect.Ironically the very core of this analysis is that Kashmir has never managed to librate itself from the fault lines of religion and has always been run on Muslim supermacy which manifested itself by purging the muslim society of the so called unislamic accretions by undermining the influence of pluralty.Significantlly,it is invoking its own version of politics and identity.As a fallout,it witnessed the erosion of communal harmony and inter-religious relations.It is however crucial to note that it became a template to be instrumentalised for political purposes.The immediate necessity therefore is to avoid the pitfalls of an approach based on manipulative agenda and deliberate distortion of facts to suit the ideological compulsions.
Looking back at the facts,more stress has been laid on the relationship between Kashmiri Muslims and Pandits.The exodus forced on Kashmiri Pandits had a negative impact on this relationship resulting in widening the gap.It is one of those sad chapters in the inter-religious relations which yielded bitter fruits. However the important thing to note is that the new found islamic identity of Kashmiri Muslims instead of Kashmiri identity sees them as a part of large Muslim community.Allied with narrow political passions,this religious feeling has exhibited its most brutal aspects.An enduring challenge and unsafe for minorities like Kashmiri Pandits therefore the relationship has come under moral scanning.
In the face of new militarised politics of post 90 Kashmir which goes beyond the conventional muslim concerns is posing an enormous challenge to Kashmiri Pandits.Reusltantly with their diminished influence,the manner in which Kashmiri Pandit’s seek to organise,protect and promote their interests is enormous and challenging too.Consequently their engagement with the State,society and politics is defined by the present day ground realities.Their issues and concerns however attract discrimination and ensuing handicap.Eventually it has become a crucial cog in the wheel of discord and the seeds of the piecemeal micro- aggression resulted in the political representation of Kashmiri Pandits becoming one of the most contested questions.Given the actual facts of the history what are the options therefore available to a religious minority like Kashmiri Pandits and how can they be effectively represented and counted.The choices available include either to join one of the political parties sympathetic to minorities or secular in orientation or to work through a non partisan pressure group that ensures the election of individuals sympathetic to their cause regardless of the affiliations.
In conclusion,Kashmiri Pandit society cannot regain its full vigour or progress to its full potential unless it fights its ills from within as it tends to restrict the scope of a functioning community.Last but not the least destiny of displaced community of KP’s lies in relating to Kashmir.